1. Issue a clear, categorical statement that BNP has no objection to transit — to any country — if it is demonstrably in the national interest. Conversely, the statement should also say that BNP will oppose any transit — to any country — if national interest cannot be demonstrated.
2. To demonstrate national interest, an all-party parliamentary committee must be formed. AL can pack the committee with its members — the number doesn’t matter — as long as there is at least one BNP MP in the committee, and crucially, the parliamentary committee is assisted by a technical expert committee whose composition is unanimously agreed by the parliamentary committee.
3. The parliamentary committee, with the assistance of the technical committee, should produce a report by a certain date demonstrating the national interest. The report should be made public. The report should be debated in and out of parliament.
4. BNP should issue an ultimatum about creating the committees. If no committee is formed before, say, Jan 2011, BNP should call a hartal on the issue.
5. If the government continues with its transit policy without demonstrating the national benefit, then BNP should make another categorical statement that should be re-elected to power, it will postpone all transit facilities until national interest is demonstrated as par 1-3 above.
Heavyset discussions regarding some documentary against Grameen Bank galore in our media and blog scene lately. National and international media, quoting a documentary, reported that Grameen founder prof Yunus embezzled a big sum o money from NORAD, a Norweigian development organization. Capturing that report, our Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina developed a diarrhea of verbal abuses aimed at prof Yunus, even the org, NORAD, whose money has been reportedly embezzled, is saying that nothing wrong was done by Grameen.
So this blog cannot keep mum on this very important issue and taking cue from all high profile media and blogs, wants to present an
in depth analysis old, over-used joke.
At the gate of the hell, one observer noticed that there is a hell guard at the hell holes for every nationals. There are few guards in the hole for American hellers, some guard for the hell of the British people, similarly a lot of guards for the hell of the Indian folks. But there was no guard near the hole for the Bangladeshis. When the hell’s guard in chief was asked about it, he told, ” we do not need to put a guard at the Bangladeshi hole. If one Bangladeshi tries to get out of the hell, the other Bangladeshis jointly pull her/ him down.”
I know you could not laugh at this old over-used joke. But that is all this blog has to say about the recent Grameen issue.