New Political Storm
A storm is rapidly forming in Bangladesh’s political horizon. As thunders are not supposed to be heard during the winter, political storm should not form under a state of emergency. But it is happening and apparently under the direction and patronage of the people enforcing the state of emergency.
What is reform
Most striking thing about the reformniks is the similarity of the wordings, contents and style of presentation of the reform proposals. In a very brief rundown,
1. Reforms are being proposed by one leader at a time in a press conference at his home. The reformists are going distances to make it look like that it is his personal proposal. e.g. Mannan Bhuiyan didn’t allow anyone to sit beside him while reading out the proposals. Same thing was done by Tofael and Razzak.
2. All three proposals presented so far are strikingly similar. It mostly proposes removal of current leader by imposing a term limit, establishment of a joint leadership, implementation of accounting transparency etc.
3. All the proposals made sure that the current leader will be out of the scene.
Who are the reformers
1. A bunch of leadership was arrested during the first three arrest drives by the government. Some leaders are still free who have corruption allegations against them and who would naturally be the next target or already would have been in jail if fairness were used in making arrests. These leaders are the leading reformers. They include Mannan Bhuiyan, Major Hafiz, Tofael, Razzaq, Abu Syed etc.
2. Leaders who have been effectively cornered in the party or had no real standing in the past. They include Maj Gen Z A Khan, Ashraf Hossain, Mukul Bose etc.
3. Relatively new comers in the parties, Lt Gen Mahbub, Mr. Osman Faruq, Lt Gen Nuruddin, Noor Ali etc., who do not have the temperament to be an opposition activist.
Who are Vocal against reform or the conformists
I didn’t specifically say “who are against reform”, rather I wrote, “who are vocal against reform”. At present time it is really difficult to say who is really a reformist and who is being coerced into it. Every single political leader starting from top notch to the local village level leaders are under some sort of pressure. It is more rampant in villages where leaders are being routinely harassed by visits, calls from local joint forces young officers.
In this background, I find the following kinds are the vocal visible conformists:
1. Women leadership, who, as always, stood up during the crisis period. Motia, Shajeda, Helen Zerin Khan etc. are the examples.
2. Relatively honest or inactive leadership who were not part of the previous governments. Barrister Rafiqul Islam Mia etc.
3. Ex Military generals who believed that their brothers in current military based government will not touch them. e.g. Maj Gen Subid Ali Bhuiyan, Col Faruq Khan, Let Gen Mir Shawkat Ali, Brig Gen Hannan Shah ( he probably crossed his limit) etc.
4. Frail sick leadership. Government will dare not touch them as they may die even during transportation in a prison van. e.g. Zillur Rahman, Saifur Rahman etc.
Problem with reform Plan
1. In my view, the reform proposals are all really good proposals except the overt attempts to dethrone the two main leaders. This one single factor may make the whole reform a failure. I feel a smarter approach would have been to include the current leadership and earn as much concession from them as possible. Now these two powerful leaders as well as millions of their supporters have been forced to take a face to face stand against the reforms. This would not have happened if the reforms proposals were inclusive of the two leaders.
2. The people who are being promoted as reformists are the birds of the same feather in Bangladesh politis per the people’s perception. People have no reason to believe that they will bring about the needed change in the country.
The looming storm
So what’s next?
In BNP’s case it is getting clearer. Mannan Bhuiyan will try to convene a Tolobi council and Khaleda will try to replace him before he can do that. Khaled’s problem is finding a willing replacement at this time. None in a sane mind will like to face the fate of Hannan Shah. Khaleda’s problem is the absence of a vocal support base at top brass of the party. All have been successfully coerced by Hannan Shah episode. So she is fighting a lone fight with occasional support of Goyeshshar Roy. Her other weakness is her sons. One in jail and one is under house arrest. She is vulnerable to be blackmailed on this issue. However lately it looks like she is getting more confident and comfortable about her sons. She boldly suggested that no charges could be brought against her son. She also knows that ther can’t be a Manju or Mamun kind of trial in case of Tareq.
Khaleda’s advantage, however, is a week opponent i.e. Mannan Bhuiyan who is already under watch for corruption allegations.
Hasina is in much better shape in that regard. She has a vocal conformist group. Her councilors are more loyal and would not be as easily coerced as BNP councilors.
Hasina’s problem will be her opponents. RATS (Razzak, Amu, Tofael, Suranjit) are the political brain for Bangladesh politics. Two consequative fall of BNP government (96 and 2007) are the result of the ruthless viciousness their politics. No government in Bangladesh will like to have these four against them, the current CTG seems well aware of that.
And the winner is
Minus two or three is not a feasible formula. Even implementing it under the cover of emergency will seriously weaken and taint the CTG. First there will be a split in both the parties. And during the election, the fairness of EC as well as the CTG will have to be seriously compromised to take the symbols away from Hasina led AL and Khaleda led BNP. Even if these two are barred from the election, their name and pictures will be used more glaringly.
And then even if the election is won by one of the reformists party or a coalition of reformists form the government, in Bangladesh’s reality, this government will lose popularity in the quickest time. Then Hasina /Khaleda (in or outside the jail) led opposition will take over the streets. EC (which played unfairly against Khaleda/Hasina) will be trashed.
In the new CTG designed government, I feel the center of gravity will follow the RATS.
It is guaranteed that the leaders, who are not awarded a ministry, will jump the ship to join the agaitating mob in the streets.
And what about the new party? I presume it will only jump like the 3rd kid of the goat. Or at max it may be a coalition partner of the reformists.
We will be back to something like November/Dec 1990 or September/ October 2007 scenario? The question, who will be the new Ershad or Iajuddin? Is it Fakhruddin or the talkative M, M, M and M?
July 3, 2007 at 5:20 am
I think the biggest thing the ‘reformers’ are counting on is the mutual animosity between the 2 top leaders. Don’t you think it is more likely that Mannan-Khoka-Hafiz will sign up with the RATS than Hasina-Khaleda will form a serious joint alliance?
There is also a brand factor in the Awami camp not present in the other one – Sheikh Rehana. There is nothing in any of the ‘reform’ programmes, absolutely nothing, that is against dynasty politics. RATS will not put up being number 2 to each other, but they can sign up under Rehana.
If Hasina is forced out, and Rehana is brought in, then RATS (and their backers) achieve everything – ‘reform’, a pliant leadership, exit strategy, the Sheikh family’s place in history, RATS’ life long ambition of running Bangladesh (don’t forget Tofael and Razzak are surviving members of BLF). Exit Hasina, enter Rehana, coupled with a FoN recognition and (long overdue) justice for 15 Aug massacre – that’s the reform of Awami politics for you.
On the nationalist side of politics there is no scope for anything like this. There is no one who can capitalise on Zia’s image – it’s Khaleda or bust. Do you really see B Chowdhury/Oli/Hafiz continuing to be under Mannan Bhuiyan?
And I just don’t see the regime allowing an exit strategy that allows a possible return of Tarek.
July 3, 2007 at 7:17 am
They own the cash but so far neither the so called reformists nor their long time partners in the crime own their past misdeed. So much being said, but none of the parties came up to the people to accept their misdeeds. What this should tell us?
‘Naturally’ those who are still at comfort in their houses will be arrested in the next drive, I am not sure. Even those who are in will be put in proper justice, allow me to doubt this.
Much euphoria has been created on those leaders exit plans, but not on their criminal offenses which need to be brought under justice, what this should tell us?
Only those who spread venoms and spoke all evil in disguise of democracy and ‘shadhinotar pokhyer’ today turn to reformers and speaking soft how do we should take it?
Mr. Rumi your analysis will bring a solid answer if you do another analysis starting from the exit plan of the current ‘interim government’. What safeguard they will have once (if) they are without their current shield at their private houses?
July 3, 2007 at 9:29 am
Jyoti,
Are you basing the inclusion of ‘the rehana factor’ on anything more reliable than unsubstantiated media reports? She has never said/done anything to let even the most imaginative person conclude that she is looking to join politics. And why would she want to help those plotting against her sister?
July 3, 2007 at 3:28 pm
hey there. Thanks for the info :). It was rather nice reading this at this late hour. i wud bump here later. t/c
July 3, 2007 at 4:19 pm
Ed (3),
The Rehana Factor is pure speculation. I don’t know anything that is not in public domain.
July 3, 2007 at 7:05 pm
IMO we as a nation are somewhat reluctant to jail female corrupts. This is probably due to the fact that we view women as a vulnerable group.
If the BNP and AL leaders were men I am sure they would be behind bars by now. I would like to find out what other DP bloggers think about this.
As for minus two – I would like to see major changes within AL and BNP and to me it really does not matter if the change formula is imposed on them by the interim military backed government.
(IMO) Khaleda is more interested in getting Tarique out of jail than the well being of the nation or her party. She would happily leave the country if she is allowed to take Tarique with her.
Khaleda is now stressing the importance of the party council, as if the council is an important body within the party. BNP had their last council meeting 14 years ago!!
July 3, 2007 at 11:37 pm
Khaleda is more interested in getting Tarique out of jail than the well being of the nation or her party. She would happily leave the country if she is allowed to take Tarique with her.
Comment- Up until today Khaleda hasn’t for a single time begged anyone, I repeat anyone for Tariq’s freedom besides seeking justice. But in the era of deception and force, the cry for justice is like KAMAR DOKANE QUORAN PORAR MOTO.
Where was Tariq’s TK 1000 crore as Mir Jafary News Papers like Daily Star and Prothom Alo frequently claimed? Why he had to be shown detained for CHADABAJI not for 1000 core in his foreign accounts? Didn’t it seem like propaganga for PRE-EMPTIVE MAN HUNT as pre-emptive strike on Iraq by WMD pretext? Why are people here so-distructed and aren’t asking what is Khaleda’s guilt while she has stepped down from power and call for peaceful election? Why didn’t let it happen? Why Iazuddin didn’t call emergency right after 28th OCT? Why did he let the situation go to ‘POINT OF NO RETURN’ and called the election off right before the fixed date when it couldn’t be reversed? Didn’t the shallow, hybrid so-called seculars brought Iazuddin in presidency? Why was Hasina making hue and cry while Iazuddin became sick and accused Khaleda of taking over presidency? Answer of all these could be found in Snatching POWER BY INFILTRAING IN ARMY, MEDIAS and Buying GENERALS, ACADEMICS IMHO. It seemed Henry Kissinger once rightly commented that if any group controlled the Medias, Academics and Military it could control the core of state’s power. Do Daily Star, Shuhil Kamal and Moin EU Ahmed speak by the same tune? There you go, there you go.
Bangla Bhai and Abdur’s Rahman’s PLEA to made them public weren’t fulfilled, Mamun reavealed that he was threatened for life by CROSS-FIRE if he didn’t admit what the new Miron, Mir Jafar wanted him to do. Similarly situation of Babar, Jalil couldn’t be known while admitting their complicities in crime. Don’t these scenarios resemble bogus Zawhary taking responsibility for attacks on occupiers in TV Medias every now & then and some phantom AQ guys claiming responsibility for the attack on shia shrine etc? Every catchy thing is happening first but behind the veneer, isn’t it? Sensationalization, speed and charisma are the weapons of neo-angels like Kamal Hussein, Mahfuz Anam, aren’t they? What does it reveal to you, FOLKS? Aren’t those efforts of perfecting ‘Creative chaos’ game of bastardous Neo-cons? IMO The catch word here is CORRUPTION like WMD in Iraq and AQ’s presence in Afghanistan. Having changed KIBLA from Moscow to DC the hybrid lefties of past and shallow secularists, are playing Balshaviky game in BD. They need catch phrase like Emmanual Goldstein of history, which is corruption in BD’s case to deceive mediocre masses. What is going on in BD completely resembles the mission of catching Emanual Goldstein, isn’t it? It’s all catch-22 and its main goal is to break the back bone of nationalists + peaceful Muslims. Tariq happens to be the biggest weapon of nationalists who have been instrumental in making BNP strong in grass-root level. Thus 1000 crore’s story needed to give birth. Shame on ‘Panta Brain’ of Bengali as Shiraj Ud-Dhula Once said, ” BENGALI DAAT THAKTE DAATER MARJADA BOJENA”.
July 4, 2007 at 12:05 am
Hah…interesting perspective Boishakhi.
July 4, 2007 at 1:50 am
yes, BNP had party council 14 years ago. But BNP also had done grass root level work over last 5 years to energize its base and listen to its activists. If you review news from last five years, you would see how BNP grass root leaders voiced their opinion, even against party and govt failure. Council is not only form intra-pary democracy but BNP under its young leadership was moving toward that direction.
This is not to support any party but to point out that many are taking current time as open season for leadership assassination but it should not paint lie as true. In current atmosphere its easy to point score on political opponents but that does not make it right by any means; not when what said is far from truth.
July 4, 2007 at 9:38 pm
#6 “(IMO) Khaleda is more interested in getting Tarique out of jail than the well being of the nation or her party. She would happily leave the country if she is allowed to take Tarique with her.”
KZ (like other mother)can have monther’s instinct for welfare of her kids. Why that needs to be compared or look down. Very stringy expression.
July 5, 2007 at 11:52 am
Rumi Bhai join the politics,i’ll vote for you..
btw i’ve got name for the 3rd party,
RAM DAL (Rawshan-Amu-Mannan) and RATS…hehehe
July 5, 2007 at 12:51 pm
Timely analysis. What is the most dangerous thing I think is CTG’s shameless hypocrisy – supporting RATS and other reformers openly while keeping politics banned. Or getting people jailed (for 13/14 years as if these are murder charges) while letting people like Mannan Bhuiya or Tofael go on without being arrsted.
CTG’s conspiracies may succeed in splitting the parties, but esp. AL is not going to be so easily split and CTG still has little control over its grassroots although they have tried to arrest 200,000 of grassroots people to try to completely wreck these parties once and for all. This is the main problem. Their manipulations are too plain for everyone to see and when politics is made open things may change rapidly. Whoever wins the next election is going to have all of CTG’s mess in their hands to deal with.
July 7, 2007 at 2:54 am
[…] in Bangladesh and establishing democracy within the parties. Rumi of In the Middle of Nowhere claims it is happening apparently under the direction and patronage of the people enforcing the state of […]
July 11, 2007 at 9:15 am
[…] 非常事態が敷かれているため、人びとは活発な政治を自制している。しかし、バングラデシュ政治を(腐敗を)浄化・改革し、党内に民主主義を確立させるための話合いは、党レベルで行われている。In the Middle of NowhereのRumiは、これは非常事態を実施している人びとの指揮と後ろ立てのもとに起きていると主張している。 […]