3 days after 1/11, on January 14 2007, when a significant portion of the country was in an euphoria that some Godly intervention finally helped the nation get rid of BNP-Jamaat stranglehold, I wrote this post called “What really Happened?”. The post was really an analysis and translation of what Daily Prothom-Alo editor Mr. Motiur Rahman wrote and was a very clear testament of the truth that 1/11 was nothing but a military coup d’état.
Nearly 20 months later, we are noticing a slow motion reversal of the coup d’état of 1/11. Although unlike the coup d’état of 1/11, the reversal is not as surreptitious; the reason of this sudden U turn of the ruling authorities remains a matter of great speculations. Also missing this time is the running commentary by Mr. Motiur Rahman. As I do not have any editorial or editor’s commentary to analyze to find our answer, lets speculate the potential factors behind the perceived failure ( at least in the short term) of 1/11 military-civil society take over.
-
Failure to control prices of essentials, provide more electricity-water, and curbing petty crimes.
-
Continued grassroots corruption while ACC/Government kept them visibly occupied with selective high profile politicians.
-
Failure in appreciating the grassroots appeal of political leadership and launching crusade against politicians without much ground work and as a result alienating the grassroots political activists across the party line.
-
Failure to hijack BNP, thanks to a glorious resistance by BNP grassroots.
-
Totally failing to read the psych of Khaleda Zia and failure in pressurizing her into submission.
-
Lack of spontaneous acceptance of the military backed entity by Awami League grassroots and Awami league intellectuals.
-
The kick– August 2007 incidence of Dhaka University.
-
General Moeen’s bold but very short sighted activities regarding India. His very visible high profile prolonged trip to India, widely publicized meetings with Indian politicians and military generals, receiving horses from Indian army chief and hosting Indian military chief and other generals for rather long visits to Bangladesh; caused more than a few eyebrows to raise. Despite rapid globalization and very close social ties-interactions with India, political relationship with India remains a very sensitive national issues and a matter of intense scrutiny by the population. It has been assumed that due to immature handling of India affairs, General Moeen very quickly lost his support base both in the military ranks and the group of general population who supported 1/11 coup.
-
A rather dumb and short sighted move by Sheikh Hasina to refrain from criticizing the government ( I still don’t understand what bad would have happened if Mrs. Hasina resorted to some lip service rhetoric against the government) after her release strongly fueled assumptions in the public that there have been a deal between AL-Military backed government. The situation turned such that BNP was not participating in the election and in a one-sided election organized by army, AL is handed the state power. This would have seriously hampered the credibility of Bangladesh armed forces as a non partisan neutral arbitrator in Bangladesh.
-
Total failure in presenting the smoking gun of Tarique Rahman in front of the nations. Something like Tarique version of the audio CDs of the confessions of tortured Sheikh Selim and Abdul Jalil implicating Hasina would have worked.
-
And finally the fractured backbones of Tarique Rahman forced the government into taking some unplanned steps.
Or who knows, all what we are seeing now is nothing but a strategic retreat by the militray leadership of 1/11 aimed at returning more covertly, effectively and cunningly, in Thailand style.
September 8, 2008 at 4:59 am
Good to have you back Rumi bhai.
My personal favourite: no. 7. I leave super-patriots I’ve met on your blog to deal with no. 8
.
I like the conclusion. When I read the comments on the other blog, it sounded as if this was the end. It’s hardly that way. If anything, one does not feel the panic among the bureaucracy that accompanied the last days of HME. So, yes, I am afraid as much as I’m hopeful.
September 8, 2008 at 8:50 am
Moin WAS simply an AW lover, who was angry seeing political collapse of AW pre 2006. Rather looking in to incompetence of AW leaders, he concluded that it was all BNP’s fault. He and AW, collaborated, and 1/11 came to existence as SAID by AW when Hasina greeted post 1/11 CTG, and declared to provide immunity of all post 1/11 ctg activities. Hasina and AW urged for ‘dissemination’ of BNP, especially Zia family due to Hasina’s deep hatred.
But, as soon Moin and gang tested blood of power, and being corrupt and greedy, there was no way a person of his character could ever resist dreaming of being a supreme leader of a nation in such a short path. Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan did, why couldn’t he? Deal between Moin and AW is same in nature as happened years ago between Ershad and Hasina. Two power greedy personal were soon found themselves in odd. Foreign players acted as catalyst and pondered with both sides. Moin with gun superseded Hasina and went to point of no return. Arrest and tortured begin. Rests were history.
#
Let Moin or AW do as much planning they want. Non-AW entity will deal with them as needed. It took time (or may take more time), but eventually we can thrash Moin & his gang.
September 8, 2008 at 10:00 am
In my observation, Moeen is a reactive hypocrate .
on 1/11 he didn’t act,rather reacted being instructed by UN.
Many times he has given reference to heinous killing of october 28 but took no action against anyone.
He is a person with nagatve attitude. politicians have done nothing in the last 36 years and if you sale vote, you have to live in hunger are two statements that reveal that he is a person who looks at the empty part of glass. If people real sold vote, people could become MP in Dhaka metropolitan area for two consecutive terms.
Next time governments should take a pshycological test before appointing chief of Army.
September 8, 2008 at 8:59 pm
Rumi bhai, I don’t think this this statement is accurate: ’significant portion of the country was in an euphoria that some Godly intervention finally helped the nation get rid of BNP-Jamaat stranglehold’.
I was in Dhaka that week, and I didn’t see any euphoria anywhere. I didn’t see any footage of ‘anondo misil’ in the TV. May be some TV talk show hosts or the blogosphere was euphoric. But if there is one word that describes the mood of the city that week accurately, I think it would be ‘relief’. If you want a second word, it would be ‘apprehension’.
This cuts across the party line. On 10-11 Jan 2007, everyone was worried about an imminent bloodbath. BNP supporters blamed AL for boycotting the election. AL supporters blamed BNP for forcing AL to boycott. But by the time of the coup, everyone was worried that the election scheduled for 22 Jan would have resulted in unprecedented violence. That’s why on 12 Jan there was a sense of relief from everyone – AL-BNP supporters alike.
And there was apprehension too. BNP supporters were apprehensive about the (soon to be confirmed) rumours about the move against Hawa Bhaban. But AL supporters were also worried when Maj Gen Matin, Barrister Moinul Hossain, and Ayub Qadri were included in the cabinet – these guys were hardly pro-AL people. On 14 Jan, supporters of both parties thought that the coup was likely to benefit the other side, so neither were euphoric about it. And if you think about it, regardless of all the arrests and releases and deals and surrenders, this basic reality hasn’t changed. AL supporters will tell you that the regime is in bed with BNP and BNP supporters will tell you Moeen is an AL-er.
The idea that there was euphoria in Dhaka after the coup is a carefully constructed mirage. It is a propaganda piece that was created in the months after the coup. It was in February 2007 that all the talks of ‘new beginning’ and ‘fresh start’ and so on commenced. Let’s not buy into that propaganda.
September 9, 2008 at 12:17 am
From New Age:
Pointing to the conspicuous absence of the politicians and political parties in aid of the flood victims Gen Moeen said, ‘It is not known to us why the leaders of the political parties are not coming to the flood victims with extending hands of assistance. But the army and the caretaker government had been and would always stand on the side of the affected people to face up any calamitous situation.’
September 9, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Video footage of CTG oath and Hasina’s discussion with reporter should be more then suffice to prove how delightful Hasina and AW was after 1/11.
It justifies “Godly intervention finally helped the nation get rid of BNP-Jamaat stranglehold”.
September 9, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Jyoti # 4
You are right, there have been overall unease and a feeling that could more be termed as apprehension. However, slowly over the month, esp after the arrest of Tarique, the feeling of euphorea was very visible in a big part of intelligentsia, a political group and a part of the population. I’ve heard Mr Mamtaz Uddin Ahmed, Syed Shamsul Haq discussing in ATN Bangla about how happy they were and how 1/11 is the second victory day for Bangladesh etc.
And yes there have been a self serving attempt to showcase public apathy as euphoria.
September 10, 2008 at 12:12 am
In big part of the intelligentsia that we call the bhadralok/susheel class, yes there was euphoria in Feb-March 2007. But that’s hardly a ’significant portion of the country’. I think when the history of this coup will be written in the future, people will be puzzling over two questions.
1. How could the coupmakers fail to remove suspicion form either side of the political divide?
2. How could they feel so confident in hitting both sides at the same time?
And it is the second question that brings me to your conclusion and DS’s point in #1. The sense I get from people in Dhaka is that there is really no sense of urgency/panic/concern among anyone – something that is a marked contrast from this time two years ago, when everyone was worried about the future.
September 10, 2008 at 11:17 pm
[ 1. How could the coupmakers fail to remove suspicion form either side of the political divide?
2. How could they feel so confident in hitting both sides at the same time? ]
From BNP and nationalist there was no suspicion at all, it was sure thing – from get-go these 1/11 invaders targeted nationalistic force.
Awami league on the other hand is in love-hate-love affair with these invaders. First Awami league claimed these invaders takeover was result of their (destructive) politics. Then Awami league chief announced giving seal of approval to these invaders activities. At this tail end of 1/11 saga (or is it?), mid night court processed executive order for release of Hasina. Oh, did I mention these invaders send second in Bangladesh mission to receive Hasina.
These invaders did NOT target both side at same time, with same intention or with same oppressive manner. Awami league was in the pocket of these foreign/local invaders except some months when Hasina acted beyond scripted behavior.
Its no telling how well Awami league has been sold to go to power in one sided election ploy. So it is utterly misleading to plant the notion that Awami league is victim of 1/11 invasion.
In history and at present Awami league had and has tried to be opportunists and tried to ride on to state power with help of military dictatorship. Yet as Awami league does best with deception and propaganda; accusing others and acting like a victim.
September 11, 2008 at 4:59 pm
Case must be filed against Moin & gang regarding 1/11. They must come to the court and explain all their activities. Every iota’s and actions of Zia family, and many political personnel have been scrutinized and publicized. We need to scrutinize thoroughly of what happened and who played what role. It is more then proof now that some people had misadventure and played a very high risk game with national interest in last few years. There is no doubt that same corner would soon spin this into AW-BNP issue. Zia family was not bigger than Bangladesh, yet personal hatred towards Zia family made these crooks to take an entire country to disaster.
September 12, 2008 at 7:23 am
[...] Post Script: Observations on the political turn- ‘Is the flame out’-Abul Momen, Columnist [PA] ‘From arrest hike to release hike’ – ABM Musa, Senior Journalist [PA] What really happened Part -II -Rumi Ahmed in his blog ‘In the midst of nowhere’[...] [...]
September 12, 2008 at 11:04 am
#10. So is anyone from your party going to file a case against moin and gang after the fact that KZ has done some kind of aposh after all?
September 12, 2008 at 4:07 pm
#12
Please, provide ‘facts’ of ‘aposh’ for public consumption. If it becomes same ‘facts’ as your party been providing for Zia family, then spare me. I can get those facts from your partys mouth piece of ‘Prothom & Daily Lies’.
September 12, 2008 at 10:45 pm
#13.
1. I do not have any party. If I dont talk for your party that doesnot mean that I am for the other one.
2. Facts of aposh..do I have to be explicit? You seem to understand everything that is implied, why do I have to provide you with proofs this time around?
September 13, 2008 at 11:53 am
Playing tic-tac on logical exchanges is childish. Let’s put it this way, I disagree with your implication of ‘aposh’.
Here are facts.
1. BNP wouldn’t go to election if KZ is not released.
2. TZ and ZIA won’t accept release unless it is done via BD court system.
3. No shangskar and compromise with Govt appointed Hafiz & MV.
4. KZ no go to foreign nation.
5. No city election
6. No decision of anything with any entity till release of KZ.
7. No KZ minus.
Not some extra ordinary demands. Few very basic demands so BNP can stay put and survive. It did, and it survived. Now BNP starts its politics.
#
Of course, what to do with TZ! Nothing, get well and come back to politics in due time. Live and healthy TZ will be a good future asset for BNP for future politics. Dead or crippled TZ gives nothing to BNP. And mostly, BNP supporters are satisfied and happy to get best out of this debacle. Now they are energized to do POLITICS.
#
Now you explain ‘aposh’.
September 24, 2008 at 8:32 am
If there is any compromise, then Moeen or CTG has done it with BNP,not BNP with CTG.