[ This is a repost from last year ]
I grew up in the residential quarters in Sher-e-bangla Nagar around the Ganavaban. We used to play in and around the unde- construction Ganavaban, the future official residence of the prime Minister of Bangladesh. Later when the building was commissioned, we were not too happy as our free playground went off limit for us. Unlike children of these days, we were hardly confined to home, rather quite independently; we used to roam around the adjacent areas with gangs of boys and chatting with the guardsman posted at different gates of ganavaban. We also learned different kind of salutes from these guardsmen and were very much eager to test our salute skill on the dignitaries.
On one Eid day, probably that of 1974 or 1975, our chance came. Ganavaban was open to public; anybody could go and meet the prime minister. We also went in, me, Hasan and Shiblee, all of between 6 to 7 years of age and easily entered the huge hall room and walked straight where bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was standing and greeting people. We went forward and promptly resorted to our much practiced salute. I still remember the affection mixed surprise in Bangabandhu’s eyes. We hoped we could do ‘kolakuli’ like others, but we probably were too nervous and was intimidated by his tall stature, and as smart Hasan showed the way, we all bend on his foot and did “kadam buchi”. Bangabandhu promptly shouted to some of his aid to feed us with ’shemai”.
Not too long after, Bangabandhu was killed along with all his family members. I was immensely saddened. It is more than 32 years, we lost this legendary leader. I still cherish my memory of meeting him in person. So far he is the first and last ruler of Bangladesh I ever met in person.
****************************************************************************
There was a tree lined road between our house and ganavaban. At the end of the road, a two story red residential building was part of an army base. A high ranking army officer lived there with his three daughters. After visiting bangabandhu, our confidence was sky high. So we decided to visit his home to “salute” him. He also took us in and introduced us to his wife and daughters. This man was colonel Jamil. Most of us don’t know who he is. In 1975, he was the military secretary of the President. On august 15, when Bangabandhu was under fire, his sons were already killed, he desperately called maj general Shafiullah, who declined to help citing his inability. Bangabandu then called Col Jamil, who immediately responded to call of duty and was killed in Sobhanbag area on the Mirpur road, while trying to resort command and control on the unruly soldiers.
******************************************************************************
Maulvi Sheikh Abdul Halim was the Imam of the mosque at Tongipara at Gopalganj who was asked to burry Bangabandhu without namaj e janaja and public viewing. But he boldly declined, on the face of the scary looking blood thirsty army personnel, to burry without namaj e janaja. About public viewing, he replied, “We can. But only if you declare him a `shahid’ (martyr).”
***************************************************************************
Our ex-prime minister used to celebrated her 62nd birthday with much grandiosity. Even last year, she, with a queen Victoria kind of attitude, received greetings and flowers at her official residence. Chhatra Dal, the student wing of Khaleda’s party also celebrated the event at Madhu’s canteen with a 62 pound cake.
This year Khaleda urged not to celebrate her birthday due to flood. I do not feel flood is the only reason. It is historical fact that anyone will lose a certain amount of reasoning once he/she enjoys absolute uncontested power. On many fronts now she is trying to correct her misdeeds and failures.
Mujib’s 3 and half year rule was marred with numerous misdeeds also. But, unlike others, he didn’t get the chance to correct himself. His last 3 and half years should not be on our way to pay him his due homage.
August 15, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Not everyone seems to have got the memo about introspection:
http://www.dailynayadiganta.com/fullnews.asp?News_ID=98608&sec=1
Instead of ‘cakes, flowers and gifts’, something sombre like a milad or human chain could have made a moral stand. Too bad that even when absolutely denied of any semblance of power these guys can’t rise above unnecessary pettiness.
August 15, 2008 at 8:58 pm
Excess of anything is bad.
What we do being as fans of late Sheik Mujib, is nothing but excess. He fought, he sacrificed a lot and he was committed to get our autonomy through economic emancipation, and democratic rights and political freedom of the erstwhile East Pakistan.
Sheik Mujib never dreamt of Independent Bangladesh. If somebody claims that he really desired or dreamt for Bangladesh is a plain lie and if that was the truth, then they make Sheik Mujib a Munafek or Baeeman. Sheik Mujib had a firm Muslim faith, not like Kamal- Menon- Enu type of Muslim. Being anti-corruption minister of Pakistan Sheik Mujib had to take oath keeping his hand on the Holy Quran to make every endeavor to maintain independence, solidarity and sovereignty of Pakistan.
So being faithful he couldn’t have dreamt of independent Bangladesh and he couldn’t have
knowingly done that mistake for just being so called father of the nation or president or prime minister of Bangladesh.
Before, the crackdown and barbaric killings and atrocities that started on 25th black night, no leaders of the-then East Pakistan wanted full-fledged liberation. And Indira Ghandi said the same thing in her Columbia University lecture in Sept/Oct of 1971. We got excess of what we wanted and it happened thanks to huge mistakes of the leaders of Pakistan and also thanks to our good neighbor India, eternal enemy of Pakistan.
I have due respect for the role of late Sheik Mujib for liberation of Bangladesh. Everybody including Zia, the declarer of Independence, was inspired by and fought in the name of Sheik Mujib. Nobody can deny pre-independence eminence of Sheik Mujib’s role and nobody did it, does it or will do it. But it is just an undeniable truth , he utterly failed to show his statesmanship after independence. That’s why we saw him to commit so many obvious silly mistakes like forming Rakhi Bahini, minimizing the role of great leader Shaheed Tajuddin and finally turning to one party rule of BAKSAL.
He didn’t have that so big statue of world leaders as we acclaim about him. He is one of the common leaders of east wing of Pakistan with spectacular excess of courage and commitment. He didn’t make any new era in politics, rather he was made of time and mistakes of Pakistani rulers. He was also made mystic and yet popular leader by his killers Faruque, Rashid, Daalim etc. If he had been alive perhaps ,as I believe, would have been more known as tyrant and dictator by most people and perhaps, there would have less room of reservation for him as we do now.
Once one late British labor party leader said and that I paraphrase as… The luckiest political leaders those who are killed or die abnormal deaths at the Zenith of his popularity. Of course Sheik Mujib was not killed in his prime-time, rather sub-zenith moment of his political career. On the contrary Zia had died and that’s why with a very short political career he can compete with Mujib.
We are doing mistake while we start to idolize political leaders; so somebody might do the same mistake de
monizing Sheik Mujib or Zia. We so exaggerate Mujibs positive role as a leader, yet we can’t quote but only one quote of him ” Everer Sangram Muktir Sangram and Swadinatar Sangram.”
On the other hand, the opponent have many bad quotes from him like, “Kotaay Aaj Seraj Sikder” after his first-cross fire killing. and also ” Aami Tomader LalGora Dabraibo.”
We also see his extreme haughtiness, pride and audacity when he once commented about Rab-Jalil/Baigganic Samajtantra group in his race-course speech, ” Era Rajniti Buje Kee? Era tau Dudher Baccha/what they understand about politics, they are just baby at the breast.”
we should do objective judgement of leaders and then we thrive and flourish the polity of our time and otherwise we will be passionate blind followers of somebody, some leaders, not creative charismatic leaders of our own and not any worthy of nation.
I pray for eternal peace of the departed soul of Sheik Mujib. Ameen.
Thanks.
August 17, 2008 at 8:18 am
My observation is that Mujib was a boss, not leader. leaders some tie loss popularity but not to close people and their popularity never decrease more than fifty percent.
But it seems thatin 15 August, 1975 Mujib’s popularity went down to 5-10% of 1972.
I read book of his lectures,edited by ramendra Mjumder. I found him using my party always, never found our party.
This also reveals he was a boss and nobody dare to show his mistakes or blunders
August 19, 2008 at 11:19 am
Beautifully said, Rumi bhai.
August 20, 2008 at 7:52 am
I don’t think, “Sheikh Mujib preferred being PM of Pakistan than an independent Bangladesh”, this thought can be so easily justified. It’s true that discrimination by the West Pakistanis were well visible. But, after somebody has won an election with a 67 seats out of total 69 in the house, the first thing to appear in his/her mind is definitely to expect an invitation from the President to form the cabinet. You can think of a split up just if your defeated opponent declares that “the house will be turned to a butcher’s place if somebody even thinks of attending it” and if the President builds on that. But before this idiocy of your opponent with President’s support, it’s not usual for you to seek independence and go for a war. You have two options, to form the cabinet with your men in order to give a good shape to your province, and the other is to go for a war for independence. He went for the first one until the circumstance was felt too bad. When the circumstance gone worst, Sheikh Mujib thought of the second and went for it. When Sheikh Mujib saw no hope for his cabinet to have a peaceful journey in coming months, the only option he was left with is the declaration of split up. So, why should we question the father of our nation that why he was late? He made the move when the situation left him with no other choice, when he thought the time was right for nothing but independence.
August 24, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Very well said Rumi vai. Thanks for the post
August 29, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Thanks, Rumi.
September 1, 2008 at 7:20 am
Bitterboy Bhai’s comments on war theatric in 71-
Before, the crackdown and barbaric killings and atrocities that started on 25th black night, no leaders of the-then East Pakistan wanted full-fledged liberation. And Indira Ghandi said the same thing in her Columbia University lecture in Sept/Oct of 1971.
My question-
If Indhira’s statement were true then why didn’t IND attack East PAK in 1965’s war, although divisions (Around 40,000 in I division) of troops were stationed in adjecent areas? Didn’t 65’s war take place after the birth of AWAMY LEAGUE and rejuvination of Bengali nationalism? Need I say more about cunning politician’s PUIBLIC CONSUMPTION/PR efforts in their own territories to keep people united? Perhaps the ready made examples are scare, smear tactics of Advani, Bal Thakre against PAK, ISI for all misearies to divert attention of Indian population that resemble Indhira’s lie along with Goeble’s infamous one.