October 27, 2007
The confusions General Moeen U Ahmed needs to clear.
Posted by Rumi under Bangladesh, Corruption, Journalism, MilitaryIn Bangladesh general peoples’ disgust over corruption can’t be over emphasized. The collective anger, hatred and the plea for a relief is enormous. It is clear that, even in the short term, people are ready for any sort of sacrifice, like giving up their fundamental rights like freedom of speech, freedom of meeting, politics etc, if that helps routing out corruption from the society. In this context, it is not very surprising that this current government has enjoyed an overwhelming public support despite many drastic measures.
It is also not a meticulously hidden secret that General Moeen U Ahmed is the de facto ruler of the country although he maintains that he is merely the army chief under civilian leadership. Let me give some example why I say so. Example 1. Remember the camera front outburst of estranged Magistrate Rokonuddoula? He was saying that he visited General Moeen three times regarding the separation of judiciary issue and Gen Moeen rebuffed the demand to halt stripping administrative magistrates of judicial power. Why a leading administrative magistrate will go to army chief for such a purely non military issue and how the general will give decision in that regard? In Example 2, General Moeen has been repeatedly making statements about election date. In an ideal civil government, the army chief will only be there to help out the civil administration during election time. When or whether election will be held or not, that is purely the decision of the civil cabinet and the election commission.
So I don’t think that there will be too much argument in my statement that Gen Moeen is the prime leader of the government.
There is no doubt that this governments’ mandate is corruption. That means that the government leadership themselves are free of corruption allegations and they will not tolerate any sort of corruption be it nepotism, be it unconstitutional use of power.
However, recently the blogs came up with serious allegations of corruption against General Moeen U Ahmed. Some of the allegations are,
1. General Moeen breached existing rule by rehiring his brother as the MD of a bank which he is the chairman of.
2. General Moeen inappropriately (Does his income/asset allow the bank to grant 1 crore taka loan?) took nearly 1 crore taka loan from the same bank.
3. He paid off 66 lac taka in one year (Where did all these money come from?).
General Moeen however strongly denied all these allegations in an unprecedented media campaign both here in USA and in Bangladesh. General Moeen claimed that he only took 35 lac taka house building loan for building his DOHS home and also claimed that he had documents in support of that.
However the blogs immediately came up with impeccable evidence in support of the allegations they posted in their blogs. The evidence they came up with,
1. The audited prospectus of Trust Bank, (of which General Moeen is the Chairmen and General Moeen’s brother Iqbal U Ahmed is the managing Director) submitted to Bangladesh securities and exchange commission on May 17 2007, clearly states that General Moeen had an outstanding loan amount of Taka 99,69,215 at the end of 2005 and an outstanding loan amount of Taka 33,15,323 at the end of 2006. That means he paid off 66 lac taka between 2005 and 2006.
2. The bloggers also came up with the audited 2005 financial statement of Trust Bank which again confirms the loan amount shown in the prospectus of the bank submitted to SEC in Bangladesh.
3. The bloggers also came up with Bangladesh Bank regulations that prohibits
a. Having family members in the board of directors of a bank.
b. The amount of loan General Moeen took from the bank he is the chairman of the board of directors and his brother is the managing director.
These are serious documents and all were in public domain and taken from the website of Bangladesh Bank, Trust Bank and Securities and Exchange Commission of Bangladesh. So mere statement that “I only took 35 lac taka loan. The story of 1 Crore taka loan is false and fabricated story to malign me” is not enough. People tend to believe in what General Moeen says. He really comes across as a very honest gentleman. But a clarification is urgently needed about the trust bank and SEC documents. Why trust bank financial statement and prospectus repeatedly showing that general Moeen took 1 crore taka loan? It is essential that clear statements from General Moeen, Trust Bank authorities and SEC, clarify the controversies regarding the discrepancies in the loan documents and the claims made by General Moeen about the amount of loan.
This post absolutely is not intended to taint, demean or vilify General Moeen U Ahmed. It is agreed that a big portion of the people in Bangladesh do love him, and appreciate his efforts/courage to get Bangladesh rid of corruption. But for the sake of a better future of this government as well as that of Bangladesh, General Moeen U Ahmed must clear the confusions created by his statement and bank documents. This is needed for the sake of Bangladesh.
The bloggers remain hellbent in following the doctrine they have preached all these days. Everyone is innocent until clearly proven guilty by a due process in a transparent and independent court of law.
October 27, 2007 at 11:20 am
Rebranding Corruption – Concocted by Fakhruddin & Family.
Masum Chowdhury was chairman of corruption ridden oriental bank until it was taken over by Bangladesh Bank. Most of the period these corruption taken place (2001-2005), current chief advisor was overseeing banking activities as governor of Bangladesh Bank. Oriental managing director and its last two owners are in jail and at large on corruption charges. But interestingly Masum Chowdhury chairman of the bank remains untouched by corruption charges that shaken banking sector. Many people in banking sector and media wondered why Masum Chowdhury who was bank chairman and at thick of the corruption was not charged?? Now truth behind SELECTIVE corruption prosecution is unraveled. Look at brief family tree of Chowdhury family, it will be clear how anti corruption hoax was concocted.
Masum Chowdhury —- brother-in-law of –> Chief Advisor Fakhruddin Ahmed
Masum Chowdhury —- brother of —> Foreign Advisor of Iftekher
Masum Chowdhury —- cousin of –> Nazim Kamran Chowdhury –> husband of –> Industries advisor Gitiara Chowdhury
Masum Chowdhury —- brother of –> Awami League advisor of Farooq Ahmed Chowdhury
Masum Chowdhury —- brother of –> BNP advisor o Enam Ahmed Chowdhury
As I said months ago this interim entity replaced one group of corrupt by another. Only difference is before people could see the corruption and talk about it. Now corrupts are more deceptive and far from public eye. Looks like getting rid of family based politics slogan of this interim entity was just a cruel hoax. I hope those who fallen for the deception (including many in this forum) of this interim entity finds solace to recover from disappointment.
http://www.dailynayadiganta.com/full…ID=47103&sec=4
October 27, 2007 at 1:36 pm
Thanks Rumi for your bold posting.
GMUA should know it better, all well that ends well. Whatever, pretext of GMUA’s PIG [paramilitary interim governmnt] made about their assuming power, whatever pledges they make to the public, whatever goody-goody performances they brag about in-and-abroad won’t work well if the secene finale flops. What the thread demands of GMUA of coming clean is the demand of the whole nation now.
GMUA is the ring master of the show or the dancing diva. While dancing no one expects he or she will try to maintain his or her hood [Nachte Eshe Ghomta Deye Dorker Kee]. Please dance with full passion, intent and vigor and be the National Idol. Otherwise, your current lovers will dessert you and make faces or dart rotten-eggs directed to you.
Thanks
October 27, 2007 at 6:28 pm
We bengalis are supposed to be tempermental and emotinal. However, we surely have overthrown that notion in the last two weeks. We have been models of virtue and forbearance, and repeated that Moeen should not be considered a corrupt person, we must wait for due proceedings. After all, General Moeen only has the ISPR, Prothom Alo, Daily Star, Amader Shomoy, and Channel I to carry out his propaganda war, I’m sure he will get down to responding to these charges sooner rather than later.
October 28, 2007 at 1:35 am
It is time to revisit the history, It is nothing bew but the replay of what happened before. Who ever thinks that whatever is happening now has happenede for the first time in the history of 36 year old Bangladesh is outright wrong.
Please read all the articles to somewhat predict the future events in Bangladesh. It makes me wonder if Ershad is back as the 12 the adviser to moeen U ahmed.
http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/90.htm
http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/91.htm
http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/92.htm
http://countrystudies.us/bangladesh/93.htm
October 28, 2007 at 7:39 am
I do agree with Tacit; what benefit Bangladesh would get by attacking General Moeen personally in the blog. If you have courage come and go to the court and raise your voice in the field.
October 28, 2007 at 8:04 am
If you raise your voice in the ‘field’ ( BTW, what is field? ) you will be arrested, charged with corruption, your properties will be confiscated and given 31 years of jail. If you go to the court aginst the general, you will face the above mentioned fate and in addition, the supreme court, led by presidency seeker Justice Ruhul Amin, will throw away any case against General Moeen in a one line judgement.
BTW, tacit did you mean what Rupen has read of you?
October 28, 2007 at 6:38 pm
Actually Rumi bhai, I was sort of making fun of the fact that people still expect Moeen to respond to the claims raised in a meaninful way. And the fact that even though Moeen has almost the whole Bangladeshi state and media apparatus at his command, they still ask that Moeen be given an appropriate opportunity to answer the allegations against him.
October 28, 2007 at 10:28 pm
Tacit, I understood your comment 3 the way you explain it in 7, not how Rupen interpreted it in 5.
Now, what can our bloggor-bloggor achieve?
In the mid-1980s, there was some scandal involving Ershad, a foreign woman, and taxpayers’ money in the form of some legal settlement. I don’t actually know the detail of the scandal (Ahbab Aziz bhai, if you’re reading this, please enlighten us with the facts). I do, however, remember that no Bangladeshi newspaper carried the story, just like how the media is silent today.
Will Moeen answer the questions? Almost certainly he won’t. Will this mean that his cheerleaders will change their view about the bona fides of the honestocrats? Many, if not most, probably won’t. But even a handful of the regime’s supporters realise that the honestocrats are not who they claim to be, that’s something write blogs for. Don’t you think?
October 28, 2007 at 11:27 pm
Jyoti
I was thinking of the same thing lately. The story of Ershad’s kept, Mariam, was at the beginning of the free fall of Godliness of Ershad.
Part of it was indeed published in jaijaidin and a result jaijaidin got banned, the editor got rusticated from Bangladesh and electricity supply of JJD office was disconnected. ( What this govt would have done? Arrest the editor, keep in DGFI torture cell for weeks, put corruption and conspiracy charges against him and sentence him with 31 years of jail. )
There was no internet then. Yet the news spread as fast as it could. I saw a photocopy of mariam’s picture and a news item originally published in a London based Bangla newspaper. The news clip was posted in the bulletin board of my dorm and all the students were crowding around the clip all day long.
October 28, 2007 at 11:33 pm
If Moeen does not respond to the allegations, he will prove that he did something wrong. He would have definitely responded if he had a good answer.
Well, my experence with the lackeys of this honestocracy is that they don’t want to hear anything bad about MUA. Their logic, “do you want those two ladies back? Are you out of your mind? ” And about Moeen’s corruption, ” Oh no. this is nothing. You folks again started!”.
October 28, 2007 at 11:36 pm
My question was very specific…..What benefit Bangladesh would get by attacking General Moeen personally in the blog? Can you answer considering the history and practical point of view not theoretical or hypothetical?
October 28, 2007 at 11:53 pm
Why has Farhad Mazhar still not been arrested, tortured, and sentenced jail for his weekly blasting of ‘Dictator General’ Moeen’s rule in Naya Diganta? Do you have any answer to this question??
October 29, 2007 at 12:19 am
Ahbab
Yes I have an answer. The Generals think FM is their men in disguise.
Do you have an answer why Moeen took 1 crore taka and confessed of only 35 lac taka?
October 29, 2007 at 2:02 am
Ahbab bhai,
I read Farhad Mazhar’s last week’s column and found him talking about judicial separation and not blasting General Moeen. The column I read before that dealt with Myanmar’s protests.
Therefore, I take exception to the “fact” that it is a “weekly blasting” of General Moeen. As is very plain, the blasting is not weekly. Please back up your statements with facts.
October 29, 2007 at 3:26 am
I was visiting the following blog and found the comments posted to quiet be interesting.
http://nazimfarhan.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html
hope, it will give you some idea how Moeen might answer the charges against him.
October 29, 2007 at 3:55 pm
Rumi,
If ‘the Generals think FM is their men in disguise’, what about others outspoken against the Generals like yourself? Are they also the Generals’ ‘men in disguise’, as per your version??
Asif Y,
Don’t you understand the difference between General Moin, the person, and his govt.?
October 29, 2007 at 4:35 pm
Ahbab Aziz
You didn’t answer my question yet. If you do not have the answer to the question you should bugger off peoples’ blogs asking all the meaningless questions.
October 29, 2007 at 5:00 pm
[...] wrote an interesting post today on The confusions General Moeen U Ahmed needs to clear.Here’s a quick [...]
October 29, 2007 at 11:24 pm
Ahbab bhai,
I’m not letting you go despite the fact that greater things are happening.
“Don’t you understand the difference between General Moin, the person, and his govt.?” Ahbab Aziz asked in #16
Unfortunately in # 12, he said: “his weekly blasting of ‘Dictator General’ Moeen’s rule in Naya Diganta?” That to me is pretty clear that Ahbab bhai is talking about General Moeen and him only. Farhad Mazhar has NOT talked about the General every week. So please, step up with facts Ahbab bhai.
And please educate us as to which spelling is acceptable so that we don’t get into arguments with you about that in the future: “Moeen” or “Moin”?
October 30, 2007 at 4:57 pm
Asif Y,
Who are you to let me go?
First, you mind your language. Then I will answer your questions.
October 30, 2007 at 11:52 pm
Apologies Ahbab bhai. “Letting you go” means simply “dropping this issue”. As you might be aware, I am not holding on to you, either literally or metaphorically.
Now that I’ve “minded my language” and thanked you for teaching me to speak properly and never using the phrase “letting you go again”, will you PLEASE answer my question, sir?
October 30, 2007 at 11:56 pm
Correction to the last one: It should say ‘”letting you go” again’, not ‘”letting you go again”‘.
Quotation marks in the wrong place you see. Ahbab bhai might fry me for that too.
November 11, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Why Does General Moeen U Ahmed is mute on war criminal issue?
He spoke a few courses, it seems to me he is an issue based speaker, it means he speak to please some people who might out raise against him. For example, he told to nation about the recognition of father of nation but he failed to do sor. He talked about corruption but how Mr. Noor Ali who filed a case against Sk. Hasina escaped from any allegation of corruption and how Mr. Moeen bought 200 acres land in Gazipure. And some prominent War Criminals are active in our politics, and though they are collaborators of corruption in last government, they remain untouched
It is concerned Mr. Moeen appeared to nation as an allegiance to Father of Nation but he is mute when people are talking about war criminals. I have experience some war criminals use such kind issue base statements and that created a doubt on him.